Resumen
En 1973, las feministas en EE.UU. vieron el fallo de Roe contra Wade 1973 como una enorme victoria. Pero en los años subsiguientes esta legislación se erosionó a nivel federal y estatal. Varios artistas se han ocupado de esta situación, sin embargo, su trabajo ha sido oscurecido por un doble velo; el arte feminista a menudo es marginado y las cuestiones relacionadas con el aborto se complican aún más por su naturaleza polarizante. Por lo tanto, los artistas que abordan este tema a menudo han utilizado los archivos para hacer visible la historia del aborto. Aquí, me dirijo a las obras producidas por REPOhistory, Kerr + Malley y Andrea Bowers. Ellas examinan las restricciones contemporáneas al recordar las restricciones del pasado; producen obras que excavan en lo profundo de los informes sobre abortos y los derechos al aborto que han sido pasados por alto. Sus proyectos cuestionan productivamente la intersección del arte y el activismo, el potencial estético y activista de los archivos y la lucha que las mujeres enfrentan al insistir que sus historias se cuenten.
Citas
Andrea Bowers, interview by Brook Kellaway, “Letters to the Army of Three: Andrea Bowers on Abortion, Then and Now”, Walker Magazine (December 3, 2012) http://www.walkerart.org/magazine/2012/andreabowers-patricia-maginnisabortion.
Ault, Heather. “4000 Years for Choice: Celebrating Abortion Care and Reproductive Freedom with Visual Arts and Culture”. http://www.4000yearsforchoice.com/pages/about.
Broude, Norma y Garrard, Mary (eds.). The Expanding Discourse: Feminism and Art History. New York: Harper Collins, 1992.
Butler, Cornelia (ed.). Afterimage: Drawing Through Process. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.
CCA Wattis Institute for Contemporary Arts, “Monuments for the USA”, http://www.wattis.org/exhibitions/monumentsusa.
Davis, Kathy. The Making of Our Bodies, Our Selves: How Feminism Travels Across Borders. Durham: Duke University Press, 2007.
Dawsey, Jill. “Andrea Bowers’s History Lessons,” Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context, and Enquiry 14 (Autumn/Winter 2006): 20.
Desai, Dipti; Mattson, Rachel y Hamlin, Jessica. History as Art, Art as History: Contemporary Art and Social Studies Education. New York: Routledge, 2010.
Ehrenreich, Barbara y English, Deirdre. For Her Own Good: Two Centuries of the Experts’ Advice to Women. New York: Anchor Books, 2005.
Emerson, Stephanie (ed.). Thinking of You. Los Angeles: The Museum of Contemporary Art, 1999.
Enwezor, Okwui. Archive Fever: Uses of the Document in Contemporary Art. New York: Steidl, 2008.
Faser, Nancy (ed.). Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange. New York: Routledge, 1995.
Foster, Hal. “An Archival Impulse”, October 110 (Autumn 2004): 3-22.
Griffin, Tim. “The Art of Politics”, Artforum (September 2004): 205.
Guerrilla Girls. “Some of Our Greatest Posters, Stickers, Billboards, Books”. http://www.guerrillagirls.com/posters/catholic.shtml.
Harris, Elise. “No Choice” Queer Weekly (July 12, 1992): 42.
Jones, Amelia. “The ‘Sexual Politics’ of The Dinner Party, A Critical Context”. En Sexual Politics: Judy Chicago’s Dinner Party in Feminist Art History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.
Juno, Andrea y Vale, V. (ed.). Angry Women. San Franscisco, CA: Re/Search Publications, 1991.
Kristeva, Julia. “Women’s Time”, Signs 7 1 (Autumn 1981): 16.
Lambert-Beatty, Carrie. “Twelve Miles: Boundaries of the New Art/ Activism,” Signs 33 2 (Winter 2008): 309-327.
Leclére, Mary. “The Skeptic’s Question”. En Nothing is Neutral: Andrea Bowers. Los Angeles: California Institute of the Arts/REDCAT, 2006.
Lippard. From the Center: Feminist Essays on Women’s Art, New York, Dutton, 1976.
Marks, Elaine y de Courtviron, Isabelle (ed.). New French Feminisms. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1980.
Mildred Hanson, qtd. In Molly M. Ginty, “Life Before Roe v. Wade,” Choice! Magazine, January 19, (2006) http://www.alternet.org/story/31049/life_before_roe_v._wade.
Moravac, Michelle. “Mother Art: Feminism, Art and Activism”, Journal of the Association for Research on Mothering 5.1 (Spring/Summer 2003): 69-77.
Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”, Screen 16 3 (Autumn 1975): 6-18.
Operation Rescue, “History”. http://www.operationrescue.org/about-us/history/.
Pagel, David. “Art Reviews: Ephemerality is Essential in ‘Raw’ Exhibit”, Los Angeles Times (August 8, 1991). http://articles.latimes.com/1991-08-08/entertainment/ca-344_1_art-history/2.
Pennethorne, Hughes (ed.). The Hammer of Witches. London: The Folio Society, 1968.
Pollock, Griselda. “Screening the Seventies: Sexuality and Representation in Feminist Practice—A Brechtian Perspective”. En Vision and Difference: Femininity, Feminism and the Histories of Art. New York: Routledge, 1988.
Pollock, Griselda. Encounters in the Virtual Feminist Museum: Time, Space and the Archive. New York: Routledge, 2007.
REPOhistory. Choice Histories: Framing Abortion, An Artists Book. New York: REPOhistory, 1992.
REPOhistory. The Lower Manhattan Sign Project. New York: REPOhistory, 1992.
Robert Barnes, “High Court Upholds Curb on Abortion,” The Washington Post, April 19, 2007, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/18/AR2007041800710.html.
Sekula, Allan. “The Body and the Archive”, October 39 (Winter 1986), 3-64.
Solinger, Rickie. Reproductive Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Spieker, Sven. The Big Archive: Art from Bureaucracy. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2008.
Von Blum, Paul. Other Visions, Other Voices: Women Political Artists in Greater. Los Angeles: University Press of America, 1994.
Wark, Jayne. “Conceptual Art and Feminism: Martha Rosler, Adrian Piper, Eleanor Antin, and Martha Wilson”, Women’s Art Journal 22 1 (Spring–Summer 2001): 44-50.